ELRIC Lab · Comparisons 2026
Elric vs Make: visual scenarios or business AI agents?
Make is one of Europe's most popular visual automation builders — great for modular app scenarios. Elric answers differently: a **team of AI agents** that understands business context, runs multi-step workflows and enforces workspace governance.

Comparison table
The table scores product positioning on execution, governance and integrations. The diagram above shows the fundamental difference: answering vs doing the work in your tools.
ChatGPT and Copilot excel at conversation; Elric connects answers to action in your business tools.
| Criterion | Elric | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Model | AI agents + memory | Visual modular scenarios |
| Contextual intelligence | ✅ LLM + RAG | ⚠️ AI modules add-on |
| Meetings → summary → tasks | ✅ Native | ❌ Manual scenarios |
| Drafted sales follow-ups | ✅ + approval | ⚠️ Templates / GPT module |
| Edge case maintenance | ✅ Natural language | ⚠️ New modules |
| Business supervision | ✅ Open Space + audit | ⚠️ Scenario logs |
| Integrations | ✅ ~33 focused business | ✅ 1500+ apps |
| SMB pricing 10 users | €10–35/mo usage | €30–90/mo ops |
| EU hosting / GDPR | ✅ Native | ⚠️ US (EU options) |
When to choose what
Choose Make
You want deterministic visual scenarios across many apps, with an ops team comfortable in no-code.
Choose Elric
Business work is variable (meetings, follow-ups, documents) and you want AI that **understands**, **acts** and stays **supervised**.
Frequently asked questions
- Does Elric replace Make?
- Not for every case. Make stays strong for deterministic technical pipes. Elric covers intelligent business orchestration on top.
- Is Make + ChatGPT enough?
- For POCs yes. For persistent memory, native meetings, workspace governance and predictable SMB pricing: an AI OS like Elric fits better.
- Both together?
- Yes — Make for technical syncs, Elric for agentic intelligence and business supervision.